All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
***
Scientists and doctors critical of COVID-19 vaccines had harsh criticism for the Norwegian Nobel Committee after it awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to a pair of University of Pennsylvania biochemists for their work in developing “effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19.”
Katalin Karikó, Ph.D., and Drew Weissman, M.D., Ph.D., on Monday were awarded the prize for their “groundbreaking findings … of how mRNA interacts with our immune system [and for contributing] to the unprecedented rate of vaccine development during one of the greatest threats to human health in modern times,” according to the Nobel Committee press release.
Dr. Robert Malone, the reputed inventor of mRNA technology, responded on X/Twitter:
“Karikó and Weissman get the Nobel, not for inventing mRNA vaccines (because I did that) but for adding the pseudouridine that allowed unlimited spike toxins to be manufactured in what could have been a safe and effective vaccine platform, if safely developed.”
Malone challenged the integrity of the award, claiming Big Pharma was behind it.
“Pfizer has been campaigning for this since 2020 — at first, they’ve claimed (as did Karikó) that she invented the mRNA vaccine technology,” he said, noting that “Pfizer donates heavily to theKarolinska Institutet, which awards the Nobel.”
“Science has been hijacked again by big pharma,” he concluded.
Dr. Peter McCullough said, “This Nobel decision will not do well over the course of history,” citing the World Council for Health’s pharmacovigilance report of adverse events for the COVID-19 vaccines:
Synthetic mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are neither safe nor effective. Their use globally has resulted in catastrophic injuries, disabilities, and death. This Nobel decision will not do well over the course of history. https://t.co/BHoMlrAYIm
— Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™ (@P_McCulloughMD) October 2, 2023
Other notable researchers, scientists and organizations also weighed in. Here is a sampling:
Nobel Prize for the greatest medical fraud of the modern era
Just as COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers are hitting the mainstream, this Nobel Prize seems like one last desperate attempt to resurrect the multi $100 billion mRNA failure!#DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg https://t.co/bZTTZSNhB9
— William Makis MD (@MakisMD) October 2, 2023
You won't like this but I would suggest that many many medicine Nobel prizes were similarly motivated to deliver false ideas into public consciousness and to delimit research practice. After all, the medical industry is completely dominated by Pharma.
— Denis Rancourt (@denisrancourt) October 3, 2023
This Nobel Prize is incredible. Not given for the core mRNA "vaccine" technology–work done by @RWMaloneMD, who's devastating critiques the clearly wish to obscure
It was given instead for the biggest (of many) design defects in the shots: pseudouridinehttps://t.co/f4rg5zvFKa
— Bret Weinstein (@BretWeinstein) October 2, 2023
Just a reminder, in 1949 the Nobel Prize for Medicine was awarded to Egas Moniz for developing…..the lobotomy.
